| Orange, T-Mobile, TeliaSonera
to cut international call fees
June
1 (Bloomberg) -- T-Mobile International AG, Orange SA,
TeliaSonera AB and other mobile-phone companies, facing European
regulators’ threats to cut wireless roaming charges, agreed to
reduce such fees by about 50 percent.
The cuts will result in a ``significant’’ reduction in
international call prices for consumers, the companies said in
an e-mailed release today. The accord includes Telecom Italia
SpA, Telenor ASA, Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA, and other European
phone companies are invited to join.
Viviane Reding, the European Union’s top phone regulator,
proposed roaming regulation in March because companies haven’t
done enough to cut fees. The proposal threatens 10 billion euros
($12.8 billion) in annual sales for companies such as Vodafone
Group Plc, TeliaSonera and Spain’s Telefonica SA.
Reding said she plans to enact new rules by the middle of next
year.
``Market forces in the mobile industry function and do not need
regulatory intervention,’’ T-Mobile Chief Executive Officer Rene
Obermann said in the release.
The company is ``glad to be part of a comprehensive network
operator initiative, which has declared to voluntarily reduce
prices significantly.’’
The companies agreed to cap the average wholesale rates they
offer each other for providing roaming services at 45 euro cents
a minute from October 2006 and 36 cents a minute from October
2007.
***
Euro nations more vulnerable than Japan to
U.S. slump, says ABN
By Simon Kennedy
June 1 (Bloomberg) -- The dozen nation euro-area economy
is almost twice as vulnerable as Japan to a slump in the U.S.,
according to economists at ABN Amro Holding NV.
In a report released today, ABN Amro’s London-based economist
James Carrick devised a ``survivor’’ index of which major
economies would be hurt most should an unwinding of global
imbalances, such as the record U.S. trade deficit, throttle
American consumer spending, the dollar and U.S. stocks.
``If U.S. demand growth and the dollar fell sharply, Japan
should cope better than the euro area,’’ Carrick wrote.
``Japan’s domestic recovery seems more entrenched and its
economy is more competitive.’’
Within the euro-region economy, Germany and the Netherlands
appear most at risk, the report said. France is ``better-
placed’’ because consumer demand is stronger there, it said. The
U.K. and Norway are at greater risk, according to the index,
which is derived from economies’ competitiveness and their
reliance on exports.
The conclusions echo a warning last week from the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development that Europe was
threatened more than Japan or the U.S. by a collapse in the
global economy provoked by a narrowing of the U.S. trade
imbalance.
The U.S. current account deficit last year topped $800 billion
for the first time and equaled two-thirds of the world’s trade
surpluses.
***
Chidambaram says Indian economy can sustain 8 percent
expansion
By Kartik Goyal
May 31 (Bloomberg) -- Indian Finance Minister Palaniappan
Chidambaram said the country can sustain an economic growth rate
of 8 percent and called for easing legal and bureaucratic
hurdles to attract overseas investments.
India today said the economy grew 9.3 percent in the quarter
ended March 31, the fastest after China among the 20 biggest
economies of the world.
Chidambaram said the decline in stock prices reflect global
volatility while the rupee’s rate was market determined.
He said overseas investors are ``waiting’’ to invest in India
and said the country must improve its roads, ports and other
infrastructure to attract overseas money.
***
Heathrow ‘should be phased out’
Heathrow:
A “truly great planning catastrophe” Heathrow should be
replaced with a new international airport to the east of London,
a planning charity claims. The Town and County Planning
Association argues 30,000 homes could be built on the
“catastrophically” planned west London site instead.
A Thames Estuary hub would stop plane noise over London and
further expansion of Heathrow displacing villages.
Lord Soley, who backs a third Heathrow runway, said moving the
airport would mean too many job loses for the area.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “The more we move
investment to the East - the Thames Estuary or wherever - the
greater the problems for the west of London.
‘Environmental limits’
“There are 70,000 jobs at Heathrow and another 100,000 dependent
on it.” In the planning charity’s paper, Heathrow’s 60-year
history was condemned as “a series of minor planning disasters
that together make up one of the country’s truly great planning
catastrophes.”
It also said the swap should happen over the next century.
But Lord Soley said Heathrow should be looking to match the
capabilities of other continental airports over the next 10 to
20 years.
“You can fit a third runway in there - everybody accepts that.
The argument is ‘can you do it within the environmental limits
laid down’, and the evidence is ‘yes, you can’.
‘Logistically impossible’
“If we don’t, then what we have to do is plan for the decline
and closure of Heathrow in the next 10 to 20 years, not 40, and
that would be a catastrophe for the west London region and
profoundly serious for the rest of Britain.”
The report also said a high-speed rail link from the new site
would be an alternative to “environmentally damaging short-haul
flights”.
The report’s authors, Tony Hall and Sir Peter Hall, said
passengers who fumed at the “long taxiing operations culminating
in a take-off queue, or at long periods spent in the four
holding areas” might well echo Dr Johnson’s famous remark about
a dog walking on its hind legs.
“It’s not that it is done well, but you are surprised to find it
is done at all,” wrote Dr Johnson. They also said it would be
“logistically impossible” for the airport to be phased out in a
short time scale of five or 10 years.
A housing development at Heathrow could be worth more than
£6.8bn, they said.
***
Saudi Prince Alwaleed allotted Bank of
China shares
By Cathy Chan
June 2 (Bloomberg) -- Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the
world’s eighth-richest man, was allocated about a fifth of the
$2 billion of shares that he wanted from Bank of China’s initial
public offering, two people involved in the sale said.
Alwaleed was awarded $390 million of stock from the $9.73
billion IPO in which investor demand exceeded supply by about 17
times, said the people, who declined to be identified because
the details are confidential. Alwaleed bought more shares of
Beijing-based Bank of China than Hong Kong billionaires,
including Li Ka-shing.
``We’re happy that we’ve got a group of well-known global
investors,’’ Xiao Gang, chairman of Bank of China, the nation’s
No. 2 lender, said in Hong Kong yesterday. ``We’re confident
about our share-price performance as the group’s continued
operations will create value for our shareholders.’’
Shares of Bank of China rose 15 percent yesterday in their first
day of trading in Hong Kong. The advance translates into a
one-day gain of about $59 million for Alwaleed, who holds shares
in companies ranging from New York-based Citigroup Inc. to Apple
Computer Inc.
Xiao declined to comment on the shares sold to Alwaleed.
Alwaleed ``secured the highest allocation given to any
individual or institution,’’ said Ahmed Halawani, chief
executive officer of al-Azizia Commercial Investment Co.
Alwaleed is chairman of al-Azizia.
`One of Many’
Alwaleed’s investment probably will be ``one of many’’ in China,
the 51-year-old prince said in a May 24 statement. The prince
has interests in China through his holdings in Four Seasons
Hotels Inc.
Chinese President Hu Jintao met with King Abdullah bin Abdul
Aziz al-Saud and Alwaleed when he visited Saudi Arabia in April.
The kingdom, the world’s largest oil exporter, wants to develop
economic and political ties with China, the No. 2 oil consumer
after the U.S. |