@

 
   
   
   
   
   
NEWS  
NEWS FEATURES  
INTERVIEWS  
POLITICAL COLUMN  
EDITORIAL  
OPINION  
SPORTS  
CARTOON  
BUSINESS  
EYE - FEATURES  
LETTERS  
EVENTS  
SOUL - YOUTH MAG  
ENTERTAINMENT  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 


 

Cricket’s bias towards batsmen grows

Bowlers like Dilhara Fernando beware. They will have to be one hundred percent certain not to send down a no-ball especially if it is in a crucial stage of a match because the next delivery will constitute a free hit to the batsman without the fear of being dismissed.

This is one of the changes the ICC has made in playing conditions at its annual meeting on Friday. What this decision does suggest is cricket’s bias towards batsmen keeps growing with no respite for the bowlers.
The ICC on Friday okayed a number of changes to playing conditions. Accordingly, if a bowler bowls a front foot no-ball in an ODI, the following delivery will be deemed a free hit and the batsman cannot be dismissed by the bowler from that delivery. The changes would come into effect from October 1, ICC said in a statement.
It was also decided that an additional fielder would be allowed outside the fielding circle during the second or third power play in an ODI.

In case a One-day innings is reduced, the numbers of overs making up each of the three power plays shall be reduced proportionately. There will also be a mandatory change of ball after 35 overs of each innings in an ODI. The replacement will be a clean used ball.

ICC also decided that the minimum boundary sizes in all international matches will be increased with the square boundary measuring at least 150 yards from one side of the ground to the other (minimum 65 yards on one side; previous total minimum size was 140 yards); and the straight boundaries 70 yards at both ends (previous minimum was 65 yards); maximum boundaries to be used allowing for three yards between boundary rope and advertising boards up to a maximum of 90 yards from the centre of the pitch.
Can anyone blame the bowler if he resorts to other means of dismissing a batsman especially when the odds are heavily weighed against him?

While the new change will make bowlers vary of bowling too many no-balls it only adds to their burden.
When the power-plays were first introduced in 2005 Sri Lanka struggled to come to terms with it and was thrashed 6-1 by India. But slowly but surely Sri Lanka regained their composure. They experimented with their batting line-ups and promoted Mahela Jayawardene to no. 3. It proved successful in England where they made a clean sweep 5-0 of the one-day series for the first time. But in successive contests that move did not work right and they had to abandon the idea temporarily.

The 2007 World Cup saw Jayawardene who was struggling for runs at no. 3 drop down one slot and recover his lost form much to the benefit of his team.
Time will tell how successful the free hit would be or whether it would follow the same fate as the super-sub.

Coach needn’t be a superstar
Australian captain Ricky Ponting came out with a defining point when he stated that a cricket coach need not be a superstar. What Ponting was hinting at was India’s appointment of former Australian captain Greg Chappell which ended in disaster for the Asian giants when they were knocked out of the first round of the 2007 World Cup.
Citing the example of former coach John Buchanan, Ponting said: “What a team needs is a man manager. Someone who manages time well thinks outside the sphere of cricket and challenges the players’ everyday. That’s what Buchanan was very good at. He helped me as a player and as a captain. And he did all that without ever having played Test cricket. A coach doesn’t need to be a superstar.”
Ponting said the critical acclaim Australian coaches enjoyed should be put down to the stupendous success of the champion team itself.

“If the national side hadn’t been playing as well as it had been doing over the past few years, I don’t think Australian coaches would have been much sought after,” he said. Sri Lanka is one country that has benefited immensely by contracting Australian coaches. In the past 12 years they’ve had four – Dav Whatmore, Bruce Yardley, John Dyson and Tom Moody, all of whom had a hand in the country’s success at both levels of the game. The tradition continues with another Australian Trevor Bayliss due to become Sri Lanka’s next coach. He takes over in September. What is most noticeable among these coaches that Sri Lanka’s had over the years is that none of them were of superstar status.

****

 

 

 

 

 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 

 

 
     

- web designed by shermil fernando