|
Preference Vote
and the Enemy Within
The
campaign to elect Sri Lanka’s seventh Parliament is
now in full swing, and this week saw candidates
being allocated numbers for the purpose of marking
preference votes. And, as electioneering progresses,
it is becoming increasingly evident that the ruling
party and the opposition are fighting very different
battles.
For the ruling United Peoples’
Freedom Alliance (UPFA), there are two primary
concerns. From a party standpoint, President Mahinda
Rajapaksa has asked for a two-thirds majority in
Parliament, so he could enact Constitutional
changes. From the parliamentarians’ perspective,
each candidate obviously wants to be elected to the
Legislature against the backdrop of a tough battle
for the preference vote.
A two-thirds majority for the UPFA
would be a challenge under the Proportional
Representation (PR) system. What is more likely is
that the ruling party would obtain a few seats short
of the 150 needed, and then engage in some political
horse trading to make for the shortfall.
As
for the tough battle for the preference vote, this
is best indicated in the ruling party’s list for the
Colombo district, where 19 seats are on offer.
Assuming that the UPFA wins the district, it would
probably gain 11 seats at most- and no less than
nine Cabinet ministers, non-Cabinet Minister Mervyn
Silva, Wimal Weerawansa, Duminda Silva and Thilanga
Sumathipala are all in the fray.
If one assumes that the high
profiles maintained by the latter four personalities
will ensure their election to Parliament, this would
mean that at least two senior ministers are bound to
lose their seats in the upcoming election- a
frightening thought indeed for these ministers.
Different politicians have adopted
different methods in their campaigns. Perhaps
following the trends set by the likes of Thilanga
Sumathipala and Duminda Silva, Foreign Minister
Rohitha Bogollagama has embarked on a poster and
cut-out blitz.
Bogollagama hails from the
Kurunegala district, and has no electoral base as
such in Colombo, being recently appointed as the Sri
Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) organiser for Kotte.
Hence the publicity blitz, where he hopes his name
recognition as Foreign Minister will win him votes.
In absolute contrast, Justice & Law Reforms Minister
Milinda Moragoda is content to canvass quietly,
publicly stating that he would not resort to
environmentally hostile propaganda methods such as
posters and cut-outs. It is a novel method and
deserves commendation.
Like Bogollagama, Moragoda too, is a former United
National Party (UNP) stalwart, but unlike the
former, he has been in the news for all the right
reasons. Moragoda is confident that his track record
as minister, as well as his strategy of distancing
himself from aggressive, in-your-face campaigning,
will win him votes, in what is largely an educated
and intelligent electoral district.
But these battles must pale into
insignificance against what the UNP has to contend
with. On the one hand, it has put up a reasonable
performance, in order to maintain its credibility as
the major opposition party in the country. Also, it
has to deal with cracks emerging from within, which
can cause serious embarrassment to the party,
eventually leading to an erosion in its vote base at
the electoral level.
A case in point is the fiasco in the Moneragala
district. It is alleged that the name of a candidate
nominated by the party has been substituted with
another name, and the Nomination lists handed over
thereafter. The UNP’s district leader, Ranjith
Madduma Bandara now stands accused of masterminding
this, in order to eliminate a candidate nominated by
the SLFP (Mahajana) faction.
While charges and counter-charges
have been traded already, needless to say, the
party’s campaign in the Moneragala district is in
disarray, and it will be the ruling UPFA which will
gain from the fallout. It will be recalled that a
similar incident led to the UNP losing control of
the Colombo Municipal Council in 2006. Apparently,
the party hierarchy has not done enough to prevent a
recurrence of such unsavoury incidents.
Then, in the Gampaha district, we saw the spectacle
of another SLFP (M) candidate nominated on the
United National Alliance (UNA) list, Dilrukshi
Sooriyarachchi, wife of the late renegade SLFP (M)
MP Sripathi Sooriyarachchi, meeting President
Mahinda Rajapaksa on Friday, and pledging her
allegiance to the UPFA.
The UNP has had to swallow the bitter pill of
parliamentarians elected on its votes later offering
their support to the President and the UPFA, usually
in return for the perks and privileges of a Cabinet
portfolio, and is quite familiar with this scenario.
Even so, Mrs. Sooriyarachchi’s volte face, even
before campaigning has swung into top gear, must be
a novel phenomenon.
It remains to be seen whether Mrs.
Sooriyarachchi’s tactics will ensure that UNA voters
in the Gampaha district will now also switch
allegiance and vote for her, despite her undertaking
to support the government, but again, this can only
undermine the UNP in the key Gampaha district, a
region which returns a larger number of
representatives to Parliament.
As for the other major opposition
party, the JVP, they have to divide their time
between campaigning and supporting General Sarath
Fonseka, who they have anointed as their leader for
this particular election campaign. It is bound to
have positive as well as negative repercussions for
the JVP.
Certainly, the General will muster
some ‘sympathy’ votes in the Colombo district, where
he is contesting, and the majority of those votes
will be votes which would have otherwise accumulated
to the UNP. While the JVP stands to gain on this
score, its performance in other districts will be
the acid test of its countrywide popularity.
As it must learn from the presidential poll, active
members and vociferous crowds do not readily
translate into votes at an election, and it will
almost certainly find its parliamentary strength
reduced from the 39 seats it enjoyed in the sixth
Parliament. We must hope that, in such a scenario,
the JVP will not resort to its previous tactic of
going underground and resorting to undemocratic
methods to attain positions of power.
This election is therefore, shaping into an
absorbing contest, not so much because its outcome
is in doubt, but because of the various implications
it has for the major parties participating in it.
Interesting weeks are ahead, indeed. |